Football Boards - View Single Post

Gzus · 09-10-2008, 05:58 PM

Um.....
1. Romo
2. McNabb
3. Eli
4. Campbell

You all are saying Romo is undeserving, but he is deserving and here's why:

Romo has only started 27 regular season games up to now, compared to McNabb (113), Eli (56), and Campbell (21).

Over those starts and all the games compared the passer ratings dole out like this:
1. Romo (96.7)
2. McNabb (86.2)
3. Campbell (77.4)
4. Eli (73.1)

Over all there games started, the stats come out averaged per game:
Yardage: 1. Romo (275.33 ypg) 2. McNabb (228.01 ypg) 3. Eli (207.16 ypg) 4. Campbell (196.67 ypg)

Touchdowns(passing&rushing): 1. Romo (2.148 TD/g) 2. McNabb (1.752 TD/g) 3. Eli (1.429 TD/g) 4. Campbell (1.143 TD/g)

Completion Percentage: 1. Romo (65.1%) 2. McNabb (58.7%) 3. Campbell (57.6%) 4. Eli (54.7%)

Completions: 1. Romo (21.44 comp/g) 2. McNabb (19.56 comp/g) 3. Eli (17.96 comp/g) 4. Campbell (17.86 comp/g)

Int (Romo's one problem area): 1. McNabb (0.699 INT/g) 2. Campbell (0.810 INT/g) 3. Romo (1.22 INT/g) 4. Eli (1.23 INT/g)

Fumbles (lost, less = better): 1. Romo (0.185 lost/g) 2. Eli (0.214 lost/g) 3. McNabb (0.327 lost/g) 4. Campbell (0.381 lost/g)

Other arguments include:

Romo has then intangible "feel" for the pocket (he can avoid pressure), sure McNabb can do it too, and Eli showed it once in the Super Bowl, but Romo does it on a consistant basis. He's as they say "slippery", ie. vs. Rams 2007.

McNabb tends to get injured too much, in the last 4 seasons he's missed 16 games due to injury (thats adds up to a WHOLE NFL regular season).

Eli is not consistant enough, hot and cold every other week (that's why his QB rating is so low compared to the rest of the QBs). Sure every QB has a bad game here and there, but in a shorter amount of games started Romo has had one or two horrible games, ie. @ Buffalo, but his good ones far outweighed his bad (not so with Eli).

Jason Campbell has yet to prove anything, both in the regular season and in the postseason.

I may be biased in my opinion that Romo is the top QB, but that's how I feel. Although, if I had to pick any other QB to be better than Romo in the East it would have to be McNabb (he's proven and a big threat to throw HUGE and scramble, and IMO much better than Campbell and Eli) but I still think Romo is the best in the division.

09-10-2008, 05:58 PM	#29 (permalink)
Gzus Romosexual Join Date: Mar 2007 Location: Big D Age: 20 Posts: 1,221 vCash: 50 NFL Team: Dallas Cowboys NCAA Team: Texas A&M Aggies	Um..... 1. Romo 2. McNabb 3. Eli 4. Campbell You all are saying Romo is undeserving, but he is deserving and here's why: Romo has only started 27 regular season games up to now, compared to McNabb (113), Eli (56), and Campbell (21). Over those starts and all the games compared the passer ratings dole out like this: 1. Romo (96.7) 2. McNabb (86.2) 3. Campbell (77.4) 4. Eli (73.1) Over all there games started, the stats come out averaged per game: Yardage: 1. Romo (275.33 ypg) 2. McNabb (228.01 ypg) 3. Eli (207.16 ypg) 4. Campbell (196.67 ypg) Touchdowns(passing&rushing): 1. Romo (2.148 TD/g) 2. McNabb (1.752 TD/g) 3. Eli (1.429 TD/g) 4. Campbell (1.143 TD/g) Completion Percentage: 1. Romo (65.1%) 2. McNabb (58.7%) 3. Campbell (57.6%) 4. Eli (54.7%) Completions: 1. Romo (21.44 comp/g) 2. McNabb (19.56 comp/g) 3. Eli (17.96 comp/g) 4. Campbell (17.86 comp/g) Int (Romo's one problem area): 1. McNabb (0.699 INT/g) 2. Campbell (0.810 INT/g) 3. Romo (1.22 INT/g) 4. Eli (1.23 INT/g) Fumbles (lost, less = better): 1. Romo (0.185 lost/g) 2. Eli (0.214 lost/g) 3. McNabb (0.327 lost/g) 4. Campbell (0.381 lost/g) Other arguments include: Romo has then intangible "feel" for the pocket (he can avoid pressure), sure McNabb can do it too, and Eli showed it once in the Super Bowl, but Romo does it on a consistant basis. He's as they say "slippery", ie. vs. Rams 2007. McNabb tends to get injured too much, in the last 4 seasons he's missed 16 games due to injury (thats adds up to a WHOLE NFL regular season). Eli is not consistant enough, hot and cold every other week (that's why his QB rating is so low compared to the rest of the QBs). Sure every QB has a bad game here and there, but in a shorter amount of games started Romo has had one or two horrible games, ie. @ Buffalo, but his good ones far outweighed his bad (not so with Eli). Jason Campbell has yet to prove anything, both in the regular season and in the postseason. I may be biased in my opinion that Romo is the top QB, but that's how I feel. Although, if I had to pick any other QB to be better than Romo in the East it would have to be McNabb (he's proven and a big threat to throw HUGE and scramble, and IMO much better than Campbell and Eli) but I still think Romo is the best in the division. __________________ GzusJuice (15-1) 2007 FBB.com Fantasy Football League Champion I R Romosexual Last edited by Gzus : 09-10-2008 at 06:13 PM.